hI
sO MY STUPID QUESTION IS -----
WHILE coding the Disp parameter in jcl ....
Disp=(a,b,c)
cis meant for abnormal execution . well i wanted to know why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution ....
This question comes in my mind again again....and now the stupidity is too much that i need ur support
why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution
Previous topic • Next topic • 3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution
by er.manishawasthi » Sun Aug 17, 2008 7:22 pm
- er.manishawasthi
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 7:36 pm
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution
by dick scherrer » Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:54 pm
Hello,
It probably was not provided for because it makes no sense to "pass" a dataset out of an abended run. There is nowhere to "pass" them to. . .
If i misunderstand, please clarify.
Because IBM does not provide for this.well i wanted to know why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution ....
It probably was not provided for because it makes no sense to "pass" a dataset out of an abended run. There is nowhere to "pass" them to. . .
If i misunderstand, please clarify.
Hope this helps,
d.sch.
d.sch.
-
dick scherrer - Global moderator
- Posts: 6268
- Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:58 am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
Re: why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution
by er.manishawasthi » Wed Sep 03, 2008 2:57 pm
i got it thnku.........
- er.manishawasthi
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 7:36 pm
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Previous topic • Next topic • 3 posts
• Page 1 of 1