OK... I've to say I haven't really experience with RACF, I'm in training phase... So may this is a stupid question...
Is there a possibility to give a USS application a permit to a SAF, independent from the user which runs the application?
Thanks for answers!
Greetz
Shady
Authorization for USS app
Previous topic • Next topic • 4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Authorization for USS app
by Robert Sample » Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:34 pm
I'm not sure what you're asking so it is difficult to answer.
However, Unix System Services does support the use of daemons which in z/OS are started tasks running in their own address space. Such programs usually require RACF entries and connections to facilities completely independently of any user id.
If this is not what you're asking, could you please restate your question?
However, Unix System Services does support the use of daemons which in z/OS are started tasks running in their own address space. Such programs usually require RACF entries and connections to facilities completely independently of any user id.
If this is not what you're asking, could you please restate your question?
- Robert Sample
- Global moderator
- Posts: 3720
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:32 pm
- Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 279 times
Re: Authorization for USS app
by Shady » Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:40 pm
The situation is...
We installed an addition SFTP server which is able to cut SMF records. This requires that the User which connects to the SFTP server have read permit to SAF BPX.SMF but we don't want that everybody get a read to the facility...
So may there be an other possibility to solve the problem, for example a permit or sth. to the SFTP server independent to the UserID..?
Hope you know what I mean^^
We installed an addition SFTP server which is able to cut SMF records. This requires that the User which connects to the SFTP server have read permit to SAF BPX.SMF but we don't want that everybody get a read to the facility...
So may there be an other possibility to solve the problem, for example a permit or sth. to the SFTP server independent to the UserID..?
Hope you know what I mean^^
Previous topic • Next topic • 4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- Authorization Access
by rajufis_01 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:38 pm - 1 Replies
- 4877 Views
- Last post by NicC
Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:50 pm
- Authorization Access
-
- Authorization Access
by edipedi2 » Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:43 pm - 4 Replies
- 3746 Views
- Last post by steve-myers
Thu Dec 31, 2015 6:11 am
- Authorization Access